|
By kind permission of Patrick Lang
The World Cup was to be brought into being by a near-perfect conjunction
of events and the support of a handful of important people. The very
name chosen to designate it was of the utmost importance. World Cup,
Coupe du Monde, Weltcup, Coppa del Mondo, echoed like a fanfare in all
the languages of the world. Even before the first race, the World Cup
was to assume significance thanks to its name.
At that time, other than in soccer, there were no other World Cups.
And soccer's international trophy had only been dubbed the World Cup
by the British that same year. Today, of course, there are a hundred
- odd world cups, in everything from sailing to cycling, fencing to
volleyball, rugby to bob-sledding. In skiing alone-including jumping
and cross-country - there are half a dozen, all inspired by the name
and, sometimes, by the spirit and the formula of the Alpine skiing World
Cup which my colleagues and I created.
The World Cup was not only a journalistic creation. I can confirm
that having been a journalist since 1940. But it was an event devised
with the media in mind-not just the mass circulation newspapers and
the sporting press-but radio and especially television.
Audiences, readers and sponsors have shown this to be right. The World
Cup has become a massive world-wide attraction. But in the early days
there were only three journalists who were prepared to put their professional
weight behind the project. Those three were : Michel Clare of L'Equipe,
the famous French sports paper ; John Fry, then managing editor of Ski
Magazine in New York ; and Austria's Kurt Bernegger, a reporter
for Salzburger Nachrichten, later with Austrian television and
to my mind the most far-sighted commentator of that era. I might never
have dared push our project forward had he and I not shared a similar
approach to sports.
And what of all the other sportswriters and broadcasters? While they
were not really against the World Cup, neither were they ready to support
it. Later I was to read with great interest that a good many of them
had, for a long time, imagined a similar ranking system. Well, such
a system was not unique. Other sports had adopted a point-based ranking
system for some time. The Desgrange - Colombo Challenge and the Prestige
Pernod in cycling, and the Golden Ski of L'Equipe, awarded ten years
earlier, all used similar systems.
However, the World Cup borrowed its format from sailing. It followed
its system of only counting at the beginning a limited number (best
three) of finishes from each discipline towards the overall ranking.
"That way, our skiers won't feel obliged to participate in every race,"
said French team coach Honore Bonnet. He was wrong. That was, we were
all to realize very soon, giving too little credit to racers' tactical
sense. Even after having accumulated their maximum number of points
in any given event, they still raced to deny rivals the chance to score
more and get close to them. After all the first place was worth 25 points.
The story of the World Cup began late one January morning in 1966, less
than a hundred meters from the "Hinterseer Farm," halfway down Kitzbühel's
Hahnenkamm downhill course. Struck by sudden inspiration, I turned to
French Team Director Honoré Bonnet and US coach Bob Beattie, who were
also there to watch the practice runs.
"What we are going to do," I said, "Is...to hold a World Cup." I was
speaking in English for the benefit of Bob Beattie, so "World Cup" was
the actual phrase I used. At that point Beattie was defending the idea
of yearly World Championships.
In a way, of course, I can take no great credit for this. For several
weeks the British had been using the term for soccer's world championship
being played in England that summer 1966.
That years, skiing and football seemed to travel a good way down the
same road. Even in Portillo, Chile, where the Alpine World Cup was effectively
born a few months later, I found myself on the edge of the downhill
course at 10 am-listening to the soccer final between England and West-Germany
at Wembley. It was thanks to Bonnet, Beattie and Dr Sepp Sulzberger,
a lawyer who, since 1958, was in overall charge of the Austrian Alpine
skiing teams, that the Cup was launched. However, it was Marc Hodler,
President of the International Ski Federation (FIS) since 1951 who had
the courage to shoulder the heavy responsibility and declare that the
first World Cup would be raced under FIS patronage on the 1967 winter
schedule.
I once read that history knows how to choose the men and the women
it needs to carry out its destiny. Perhaps it is true. After all, I
held no mandate in any ski federation. The only official title I had
was president of the International Association of Ski Journalists. But
this was enough to enable me to have official-and usually friendly -
relationships with the executives of the various ski federations, the
FIS and, more importantly, its president.
Even though Hodler had long been enthusiastic about such a project,
nothing was certain in Portillo. Even after long days and nights of
negotiations with my three partners and with the project finally ready,
Bob Beattie doubted that we would get FIS approval. For a week he had
set out possible objections while still being one of the World Cup's
greatest supporters. Then one evening he got up from the table, pointed
to a piece of paper on which we had noted the various points of our
agreement-the dates of the first schedule the rules and the points system
and so on-and said : " Marc Hodler will never accept this proposal ".
Fortunately this was a gross misreading of Marc Hodler, of his sportsmanship,
enthusiasm, goodwill and his long range vision. The next day, around
noon, and in the same bar where - with the aid of much "Pisco" and coffee
- we'd just spent a good part of our Chilean nights, Marc Hodler studied
the proposal for a few minutes then asked simply : "What time do you
want me in the Press Room to announce the creation of this World Cup
? "
So everything was set. In the heart of the Andes, thousands of miles
from the Alps, the old pre - World Cup ski racing died on 11 August
1966. And another, new era, whose outlines we could not yet make out,
was about to begin.
The simultaneous naming of Bonnet, Beattie and Sulzberger as the three
head coaches of their respective national teams, lent them considerable
credibility. Since the retirement of Austria's Fred Roessner in 1956,
no coach had attained the stature. This could also lead one believe
that, they too, were destined to fundamentally alter the face of Alpine
Ski racing.
At that time international ski racing was in the doldrums - except
for its natural peaks, the Olympic Games and the World Championships
which kept their dominating role thanks to the media an popular support.
However, there was a new medium to contend with. At about this time,
the growing interest of television highlighted the need for change in
the ski racing format. I had already begun to make its presence felt
in the skiing world, making its own stars out of what had formerly been
simply ski racing champions. Racers likes Jean Claude Killy, Karl Schranz
and Leo Lacroix clamored for TV attention. International skiing was
desperately in need of a new showcase.
Bonnet and Beattie had come up with the idea of the Alpine Countries
Cup some time before. The concept had played down individual victories
and elevated nation-by-nation racing. This was an excellent idea in
itself, but likely to generate mass support. Ski racing is a sport of
individuals, not a team game. And TV wanted to concentrate on stars.
However, in 1965, Beattie, Bonnet and Sulzberger decided to create
a tournament in Vail, Colorado, restricted to the American, French and
Austrian teams. To justify this three-country "World Series", Beattie
stated that the contest would exclude nations whose athletes had not
won medals in the Innsbruck Olympic Games the years before. This was
the case for the Swiss, who had been freewheeling since the tragic death
of Georges Schneider in the summer of 1963, and for the Canadians.
While the US, French and Austrian skiers battled it out in that memorable
encounter in Vail, the Swiss, left to their own devices, turned the
snub into a question of prestige. Many of their racers then skied on
American-made Head skis. Then there was the matter of FIS-points : the
athletes competing at the three-nations contest at Vail were reaping
points by the sackfulll. It was in mid-March 1965, with the Vail series
still in progress in Colorado that a powerful Swiss team descended on
Sun Valley, Idaho, where the North American circuit was continuing with
the Harriman Cup. Despite the antagonism generated by the limiting of
the Vail contest, all Alpine countries had, by coming to USA, implicitly
accepted the idea that the American circuit was worthy of their best
racers.
But something else was also triggered during 1965. It happened in
summer, far from the slopes, in the heart of Roubaix where a dense crowd
had gathered to witness the morning start of one of the stages of the
Tour de France. Through the confusion of the cycling teams' arrival,
Jacques Goddet - chief editor of l'Equipe and head of the Tour de France
itself - strode towards me in pressed khaki pants like central-casting's
idea of a British officer.
"Hello Serge" he said. "Listen, dear friend, no-one can make head
nor tail of this ski racing business anymore. One day Killy is winning,
the next it's Schranz, Marielle or Billy, Dick or Harry. Come on, get
me something together. A challenge to decide the winner, a gimmick or
an event like the Super Prestige Pernod in cycling. Fix it with Albert
de Wetter and get me outline before the end of the Tour de France" At
that time, De Wetter, a noted journalist, was one of L'Equipe's two
representatives in the Publicis group, the main advertising agency of
this important sports paper. De Wetter shouted me over an awful cacophony
of car horns : "I've found a client who wants to spend a quarter of
a million to link his logo with skiing and snow - it's Evian mineral
water. You get the picture - drink Evian and feel like you're in the
French Alps. Set up a challenge with a ranking over a number of races...See
you at Bordeaux".
In Saintes, on the eve of our next meeting, I drafted my project.
There was to be a point system : 25 for the winner, 20 for the second,
15 for the third and son one until 1 for the tenth. There would be a
dozen races. Everything was to begin at Hindelang in the western part
of the Bavarian Alps and to end, at the beginning of March, in Murren
with the Arlberg Kandahar where all the points would be added up. It
was a simple idea and, including the schedule, it fitted on two-double
spaced pages.
I gave my outline to De Wetter the night of the Bordeaux stage of
the Tour de France. But it did not seem to interest him as much as it
had a few days earlier in Roubaix. The challenges was, however, to begin
- as scheduled - a few months later. It was won by Karl Schranz and
Marielle Goitschel yet it was named "Challenge de l'Equipe" and not
"Challenge Evian" . Because of a banal misunderstanding, the original
sponsorship agreement had never been completed.
The "Challenge de L'Equipe" survived one year. A wasted year ? Hardly.
That season was a great prelude to the World Cup. After Billy Kidd,
who led the Challenge after his slalom victory at Hindelang, injured
himself during the Hahnenkamm slalom at Kitzbühel, no-one talked anything
but the World Cup - the name which had struck a chord a stone's throw
from Hinterseer's farm.
The first World Cup would, however, be graced by the Evian Trophy
- the famous Crystal Globes introduced in 1968. Once Evian learned that
what a stake was no longer a challenge but an authentic World Cup under
the aegis of the FIS, the company wanted to share it.
I have good reasons to believe that had the 1966 World Championships
- then held every four years - taken place anywhere else but Portillo,
Chile, in the Southern hemisphere far away from the Alps, the World
Cup would never seen the light of the day. The Southern Cross were to
be our lucky stars. If those World Championships had been awarded to
a more traditional European venue - Davos, Garmisch or Kitzbühel for
instance - our proposal for a World Cup - which would run throughout
the season from country to country - would not have overcome the opposition
of the most conservative voices in skiing. But in Portillo, they were
of no consequence. They did not come.
The move to Portillo was itself revolutionary. Think of it...what
kind of idea was it, to go and hold World skiing championships, in midsummer,
at the far end of the world, let alone to discuss a new idea for a World
Cup ? Anyway, at the crucial moment, the stick-in-the-muds were not
there to bray that a World Cup would serve no purpose and would only
cause additional problems. Of course, they made their positions known,
but much later - too late, once everything had begun.
The whole set-up in Portillo was of vital importance too. The small
resort was situated a few kilometers from the Chilean-Argentine border,
perched at nearly 9,000 feet. All the skiers and officials had to live
together in a single hotel offering only 100-odd beds. This excluded
battalions of unwelcome visitors. Everything had to happen either in
the hotel or on the slopes. While the Andes offered an admirable diversity
of skiing, in the hotel everything was confined to dining room bar and
the basement night club where those who professed to find sleeping difficult
because of the altitude spent their nights.
It was in that bar, which was deserted after dinner, that Bonnet,
Beattie, Sulzberger and I sat day in, day out. In Portillo, the French
feasted on medals - 16 out of a possible of 24 and a new World championships
record. While the racers' attention was fixed on the events of the World
Championships, most of them greeted the idea of the World Cup with enthusiasm.
Jean Claude Killy, who was to be the big winner of the Portillo events,
told me a few days before their start :
And that was exactly what happened. In Portillo, the "Black Eagle "
from St Anton, who, a few months earlier had eclipsed all his rivals,
had to settle for a consolation bronze medal in the giant slalom race.
A few months later, as the opening date of the first World Cup approached,
I had misgivings. How would it be greeted by the countries with long
skiing traditions, whose racers were already classic events long before
the World Cup as though of. Later, the Cup not only helped all the classics
but proved to be crucial in the development of many races and many resorts.
The first inkling of how the traditional skiing countries would react
came from Ernst Gertsch, the father of Wengen's Lauberhorn races. The
name , he announced, would be on the hole range of the official
programs, poster and result sheets, as would be the Cup's rule and regulations.
Adelboden - through Dr. Fred Rubi, director of the tourist office and
a high Swiss government official - gave proof of its co-operations a
few days later. But Kitzbuhel - the Mecca of Tyrolean Alpine skiing
where the people are wary of anything they have not thought of and created
themselves - would be the moment of truth. In discovered the answer
as I arrived in the center of the town. In front of the Hotel Tenne,
a banner spanned the main street proclaiming the magic word "Weltcup".
In Germany, where Berchtesgaden organized the first two men's World
Cup events on the slopes of the Jenner, no notice was taken of it. But
it is true that we did not take care to inform Berchtesgaden of its
presence on the World Cup calendar. Kurt Bernegger, of the Salzburger
Nachrichten saw it coming though. The day before the Berchtesgaden races,
he headlined his January 5th article : "Historic Day for Skiing - the
World Cup is Coming".
And in Madonna di Campiglio in Italy, the organizers realized too
late that a slalom, run in their traditional "3-Tre" event was to count
towards the Cup. In the event, the Cup would only fire the Italian imagination
in December 1969, with Gustavo Thoeni's first victory in the Val d'Isere
giant slalom. Thoeni clinched the Cup four times from 1971 to 1975.
The Governor of Massachussetts, Napoleon Volpi, was to make no mistake
about it, however. When our Pan-Am flight landed in Boston in March
1967, he was there to greet the World Cup racers heading for Franconia,
New Hampshire, where the World Cup was to make its American debut.
Jean Claude Killy's achievements in the most prestigious downhill
and slalom races certainly helped his own personal prestige by winning
the first overall World Cup title. But perhaps even more, he helped
the prestige of the World Cup which motivated him so strongly.
But it was with the tense duel in America between France's Marielle
Goitschel and Canada's Nancy Greene later that season that the World
Cup really took off. By the time of the final slalom at Jackson Hole,
Wyoming, only an outright win by Nancy could deprive the French girl
of her overall points lead and the first Crystal Trophy. To the delight
of the North-American audiences, Greene took the slalom by 7/100 of
a second and with it the overall World Cup. As a dramatic event, the
World Cup had proved itself beyond all our expectations.
The endless Portillo nights, the hours and hours of discussion, the
tired old arguments, the rehashing of issues we'd thought already solved
had proved worthwhile. The dace of Alpine Skiing had been changed for
ever at a stoke. During that 1967 season, the downhills, slaloms, giant
slaloms, whether great classic or races until then of modest importance,
had all suddenly become stars events.
The celebration of the World Cup's successful first year took over
Jackson Hole, the season's last stop. And some party it proved to be.
No-one had anything like it in Wyoming since the days when, after six
months of hunting and trapping alone the Snake River, the rugged mountain-men
of yesterday would come to town to let off steam.
Then it was time to prepare the World Cup's second season. Firstly
we realised it was crucial to place it officially under the aegis of
the International Ski federation. This was to happen in June 1967, in
Beirut, only a few days before the Six days War. Beirut was chosen -
over many other sites - by the preceding FIS General Assembly. As the
meeting began, Beirut was still a magic city of great beauty and peace
but high in the skis, the vapour trails of the Israeli Mirages were
visible above the ruins of Baalbek.
Backstage at the FIS, the in-fighting began immediately. I was shocked,
The World Cup which ad come so far still annoyed a lot of people. Only
tow months after Jackson Hole, Bob Beattie was already unsure that we
had made the right move. I was too. We wondered what would have happen
of we simply took the World Cup back and ran it ourselves, selling the
individual races to local organisers as does the Tour de France ? And
why not ? Setting up such a structure independent from the FIS would
have been possible. Legally, the World Cup still belonged to those who
had invented it and promoted it, not to a federation filled with voices
which called for it to be banned. Bon and I became involved in seemingly
endless discussions again about the World Cup, just as we had done the
year before at Portillo. But we both eventually came to the same conclusion
: if we wanted to take the World Cup back and run it ourselves, it could
be done.
Nevertheless, we also concluded that it was unthinkable to act in
a way which Honoré Bonnet, Sepp Sulzberger and , most of all, Marc Hodler,
would have seem as an intolerable departure from the spirit of the initial
project, and perhaps even, as a betrayal of its ideals. Bob and I abandoned
our dreams and got down to the difficult task of putting the cased for
a World Cup circuit under the aegis of the FIS. I had spread myself
thin in the first hectic days in Beirut, reassuring those delegates
who needed reassuring, enlisting those who needed enlisting. BY 2 PM
on the final day, everything seemed to be settled. In a restaurant on
the Beka Plain cooled by a waterfall, I walked over to March Hodler
who was finishing his lunch. "They're all agreed" I told him. "If you
get them together over coffee, everything can be settled in a few minutes".
Hodler looked at me : "Out of question" he snapped. "The downhill-slalom
committee wants to debate the World Cup's FIS ratification - pretending
that they were not advised - well, let them go back to Beirut and debate
it then. They deserve it.
I too left that cool oasis to return to Beirut only to find a worried-looking
Peter Baumgartner, member of the Swiss Federation, pacing outside the
room. "Don't join it" he told me. "Don't go in. They are furious at
having had to come back to Beirut. If they see you, they will be even
less favorable".
The discussion lasted several hours. Finally, as expected, the downhill-slalom
committee members agreed. There was one additional tangible result :
Bibbo Nordenskjoerld from Sweden was elected to the new World Cup committee
headed by Marc Hodler. Thankfully, he was a great friend of modern ski
racing and he always supported the World Cup.
Next day, the convention ratified the downhill-slalom committee's
motion. And so, at last, the World Cup became an official FIS event.
As the delegates left Lebanon unconsciously living through it last hours
of happiness, the Six Days War was beginning. But for the World Cup,
the danger was over and ski racing was on its way to becoming a major
international sport.
The Nations Cup: Last minute addition to the World
Cup program
John Fry, SKI's Editor-in-chief, recalls that his long friendship with
Serge began in the late summer of 1966 in New York City. After the World
Alpine Championships in Chile, Serge flew to New York and stopped by
Fry's office at SKI Magazine in Manhattan, where the two men met for
the first time.
It was already August, so the first World Cup season would start in
a little more than four months.
"SKI Magazine should be part of it," Lang said to Fry. "What would
you like to do? Why don't you come up with an idea."
"Right now, I don't have an idea."
"Fine, let's go to lunch," said Serge. "I know a very good Italian
restaurant on Madeeson Avenue."
The Madison Avenue lunch produced no ideas, but waking the next morning,
Fry came up with one. Why not accumulate the points of each nation's
racers and create a team competition - albeit an after-the-fact statistical
one? The team, whose racers aggregated the most points by the end of
the season, would win a trophy, called The Nations Cup. Year by year,
the standings would compare how the alpine skiing nations ranked in
strength.
That morning, before Lang flew back to Europe, he dropped by SKI Magazine's
office, where Fry explained his proposal. "And SKI Magazine will present
the trophy," he added, "not to an athlete, but to the head national
coach, as a means of recognizing the role played by the trainers."
"It's good," Serge said quietly. "It's good," he repeated. The two
men shook hands. The Nations Cup would be an official part of the World
Cup competition.
In the winter of 1967, after the first World Cup races had been held
at Megeve, France, Adelboden, Switzerland, Kitzbuehel, Austria, Berchtesgaden,
Germany, and Sestriere, Italy, the entourage of racers, coaches, officials,
press and their mountain of luggage and skis flew to the United States.
The first North American World Cup races were in March at Cannon Mountain,
New Hampshire. On assignment from Fry, Serge had written a profile of
Jean-Claude Killy. Meanwhile Fry wrote about how the World Cup point
system worked, and the description of the new competition was published
as an insert in 100,000 copies of SKI. It was also distributed as a
program at the race. Fifteen thousand people - the largest crowd yet
assembled for any alpine ski race in America - thronged the steep bottom
slopes at Cannon Mountain. The World Cup had truly arrived in America!
|
|